Twitter and Discussions - A No Go
Written by Robert Bacal | 
| 
| 
| Social Media Platforms - Twitter |
In a blog post Richard Nantel shares his perceptions about using Twitter for discussions in an article entitled The Challenges of Using Twitter for Discussion. It's a simple short article that hits the nail on the head. It's noteworthy as an exemplar of the emergence of more and more critical thinking applied to Twitter, and social media in general. Below is the comment I made on Richard's post.
I'm with you on all this, but more so. To add, the pace is such that there's an illusion of learning and communication on Twitter as one gets caught up in it.
What's interesting is to go to a chat transcript and read it, not having been apart of it, and the "conversations" are really laughable if you remove the frenetic pace. It's like being trapped in a fortune cookie factory.
There is SO much evidence of the limitations of twitter as an effective communication medium (ie. as touted as a medium for dialogue) that it's amazing otherwise intelligent people can't see the lack of depth of content.
Ironically, the characteristics that have made Twitter attractive initially (the buzz of fast participation) is exactly what keeps it from being an effective communication medium, and will also be the reason why it isn't long term viable as a business.
Anyway, it's interesting, that the huge majority of people who try Twitter leave it. And, the real though leaders, like Seth Godin, Jaron Lanier, Bing and others are slowly emerging as strong critics of both social media and Twitter.
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
 |
| Subscribe to Work911 Ezine |
| Visit this group |
Scoundrel
MicroThoughts
You can tell your "social media expert" is a scoundrel or utterly ignorant if they use the phrase "They just don't get social media". The truth is that the expert doesn't get social media, or how human beings work and is unable to come up with anything better to refute arguments or disagreements about social media.
Mashable no-no
In response to a Mashable article about how Starbucks supposedly used social media to bring one million people into their stores in a day:
This is just terrible "journalism". First, the giveaways brought the people in. Second, we have no idea how many people came for the freebies hearing on it from Twitter or not. Third, They could have pulled people into their stores with this promotion in any of a number of ways. This is not a social media success, anymore than having sandwich board guys outside of each store would constitute a success for loitering.
Learn From Competition?
Some believe you should monitor and emulate your competition on social media. Here's a thought:
If you look at your competitors, will you end up looking like your competitors? The ongoing issue in any marketing or even in developing a network is how to standout FROM the competition, and not to BE like the competition.
Social Media Frauds
You know someone isn't worth following if they retweet compliments given to them by others. They are either frauds who are better at self-promotion than they are in their alleged area of expertise, or they are so insecure that they have to -- just have to, make sure that everyone knows how wonderful other people think they are. Hint: Run away. These folks are like empty drums. Bang on the outside and you get a cool sound. Empty inside -- nothing to offer.
Immersion
You cannot fully understand social media solely by being immersed in it. In fact, one reason why there is so much bad information about social media is that most of it comes from immersed people. The full picture is only available to people who can DISTANCE themselves emotionally and intellectually and see social media from the outside -- as most human beings view it.
Full Social Media Bust Feed - Atom
Social Media Bust Articles