Social Media Winner - Gina Schreck @ginaschreck

Written by Robert Bacal |

Learning From The Winners & Losers of Social Media - Learning From Social Media Stars and Winners

Gina Schreck is our first learning example of someone who uses social media in extraordinarily powerful ways, and in ways that show off what social media can do when used properly. Much to be learned.

Gina is an advocate for virtual reality, and in particular the use of Second Life. Normally, I don't find advocates open minded or even moderately willing to reconsider things from those that see the world a bit differently, but Gina is a prime exception. She tweets, she uses Facebook, she speaks professionally and seems to have a very intergrated view of how all the various pieces -- print, social media, website, personal appearances, all mesh to create something that is powerful and effective. She is by far the best advocate I've seen in the past year.

I don't know Gina except for occasional interactions online, but one of the indicator questions I apply is whether I would want to sit and talk with a person, in person, based on their social media presence. Gina, come on over! There's another indicator, just as important. Do I get the impression that the person would be interested in what I have to say, and be truly interested in learning from others. Gina, again, come on over.

So, what does Gina actually do to give those impressions? Here's what I get from her posts and why.

I'm particularly alert to self-promotion and it's a turnoff, even when it's subtle. When Gina talks about what she is doing, and she does fairly often, her excitement comes across as genuine, and not coming from a place that has $$$'s attached. I don't recall examples of when I thought "Ugh, she doing that self-promotion thing". Ever.
She's funny and entertaining. She tweets a good deal about her social media passions, but she tweets enough on other subjects, and in such an amusing way that it's interesting, and entertaining. Not a "one trick pony". A real person.
She talks just enough about her personal life to humanize herself, but not so much that you wonder why you are reading "this". Her very occasionaly references to her child, The Schrecklet are amusing and even insightful.
She responds to disagreement better than almost anyone in social media. She doesn't ignore it. She considers the points. She doesn't try to convince. That is incredibly refreshing and REAL. No defensiveness.
She knows her stuff, BUT she also asks real questions if she doesn't know something. That exemplifies the fundamental values of social media that we are rapidly losing.

Frankly, I'm not sure Gina actually sleeps, she is so active and USEFUL. And convincing in her own way.

I'll share a secret. The best way to get people excited about something is to be excited and to be able to share that excitement in a non-intrusive way. Can you believe that Gina actually got me to log into Second Life? That's an accomplishment, and yes, it's cool.

I also know, from reading, that Gina has introduced Second Life to probably hundreds of people. That is EFFECTIVE use of social media.

Gina, if we had more like you, not only on social media but people who were as energetic and articulate, we'd have a heck of a better world. Of course, Gina, you are welcome to comment and share more of how you view social media, I'd be honored if you shared, if you have time. Leave a comment!

blog comments powered by Disqus

< Prev

Social Media Frauds

You know someone isn't worth following if they retweet compliments given to them by others. They are either frauds who are better at self-promotion than they are in their alleged area of expertise, or they are so insecure that they have to -- just have to, make sure that everyone knows how wonderful other people think they are. Hint: Run away. These folks are like empty drums. Bang on the outside and you get a cool sound. Empty inside -- nothing to offer.

badbehavior

Technology legitimizes behavior, good or bad, through a process of making some behaviors easier than other behaviors. People then use easy routes because they are simply easier, even if the use of those methods are unethical, dishonest, or otherwise nasty. For example, technology legitimizes spam email because it has made it easier to contact thousands of people via spam email than any other email method. When in doubt about what something is doing, look at the behavior (spamming) and not the expressed prohibitions. How does this apply to social media?

Best Practices In Social Media? Fergetabatit

Most regular people don't have the time or inclination to read post after post, article after article telling us how to use social media to accomplish business goals. As a result most don't realize how poor and conflicting the advice is. For example, did you know that the key top business success in social media is content (how old fashioned)? No, wait. The next post on the same site says the key is relationship building one by one, while old Guy whatshisname says "No, no, it's all about the follower numbers, forget quality or relationships -- automate."

Is this significant? All the contradictions? You tell us. Who do you listen to? Is there any point to talking about best practices? Worse, could it be that they're all making things up?

SocialMediaBust