Giving The Business to Social Media - The Book - Window On Social Media

If you don’t know Wiki’s are examples of social media used to create user built encyclopedias online, where people like you can participate in generating definitions, meanings, explanations and so forth.

Unfortunately, as noted elsewhere, the quality of the content is variable, as is the case with most social media platforms. Contributing requires no special skills, abilities or knowledge, and contributors to social media platforms are often driven by their personal agendas and biases rather than a desire to adhere to facts and truth.

If you search in Google for “social media”, the first site that comes up is the Wikipedia page. That’s also common. For a number of reasons, the simplest being popularity and incoming links, social media platforms such as Wikipedia, and Facebook often come up at the top.

But...well, oops. As with much on social media if you already know a lot about a subject and you are just looking to tweak your knowledge, these sites are great. If, however, you know very little, you won’t be able to determine what is accurate and what isn’t.

There’s a lot of good stuff on the Wikipedia entry. Then again, there are some logical and factual errors, particularly in the section on comparing social media with “industrial media”.

Specifically:

Permanence - industrial media, once created, cannot be altered (once a magazine article is printed and distributed changes cannot be made to that same article) whereas social media can be altered almost instantaneously by comments or editing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_media

This is incorrect. In fact, both social and industrial media content can be modified after the fact by adding to it, or commenting upon it, although social content, because it is “virtual” content can be modified this way on a much faster time scale. Whoever authored this particular section confused a number of factors.

So Who Cares?

In this example, the errors are fairly trivial, but the point is YOU should care.

First, if you get the majority of your information about social media ON social media sites, you are getting a biased, and unedited stream of truths, half-truths and incomplete truths, and outright false information.

Second, as a business person subject to comments made about you, your brand and your product are also susceptible to half-truths and incomplete truths put forward on the social web.

You cannot control the latter, and your ability to address the impact of half truths and falsities is limited.

(This is a preliminary, unedited and unproofed draft segment from "Giving The Business To Social Media, Hype, Hope, Bust, Reality")

Share/Save/Bookmark

blog comments powered by Disqus
 
Visit The Library
Our Social Media Library has hundreds of hand picked articles on social media use, and business, including sections on Psychology of social media, advertising, and the future. Click here to go there.
Newsletter
Work911 Ezine has been published in one incarnation or another for 18 years. With over 9100 subscribers, we provide articles, information, free offers, and product discounts, and we do so ethically. Stay up to date on a number of work related topics. Subscribe now!
Google Groups
Subscribe to Work911 Ezine
Email:
Visit this group
MicroThoughts

Best Practices In Social Media? Fergetabatit

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

MicroThoughts

Most regular people don't have the time or inclination to read post after post, article after article telling us how to use social media to accomplish business goals. As a result most don't realize how poor and conflicting the advice is. For example, did you know that the key top business success in social media is content (how old fashioned)? No, wait. The next post on the same site says the key is relationship building one by one, while old Guy whatshisname says "No, no, it's all about the follower numbers, forget quality or relationships -- automate."

Is this significant? All the contradictions? You tell us. Who do you listen to? Is there any point to talking about best practices? Worse, could it be that they're all making things up?

 

Myth of Consumer Empowerment

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

When you see someone expounding on how social media is empowering the consumer or shifting the power balance, you can be sure that the person understands NOTHING about power and influence. It's illusion based on false idea of how things change via use of power. Individuals have no more power than they ever had to affect things, and collectives (groups) only have power if they can be made to act in concert in the real, not virtual world.  

It's Not WHAT is said, but WHO Says it

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

Watching hundreds of retwitterations of Godin/Solis every day, and what strikes me is that a lot of the quotes people resend are lacking in thought, insight or are incorrect. NO thought on part of readers, just blind clone - new social dittohead behavior. Not to say these fellows don't say good stuff, but just that they could be completely wrong, and everyone would still applaud.  

Sex and social media

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

You probably don't believe that sitting at a computer "having sex" with someone sitting at his/her computer is as good as face-to-face...er...engagement. So why would you believe that customer service that involves one person at one computer and another at another computer is as good as two people actually engaging in person? Both mediated sex and mediated communication are not the same as the non-virtual ones.

 

Media:

Attention: open in a new window. PDFPrintE-mail

Mediated communication refers to any communication between two people that has, as the carrier of the message, a technology (ie. computer, social media platform software). The more technologies and pieces that mediate communication between two people, the more distortion will occur as a result. Also the more complex the mediating technologies, the more chance of distortion.

 

hit counter